段1:①To paraphrase 18th-century statesman Edmund Burke, “all that is needed for the triumph of a misguided cause is that good people do nothing.” ②One such cause now seeks to end biomedical research because of the theory that animals have rights ruling out their use in research. ③Scientists need to respond forcefully to animal rights advocates, whose arguments are confusing the public and thereby threatening advances in health knowledge and care. ④Leaders of the animal rights movement target biomedical research because it depends on public funding, and few people understand the process of health care research. ⑤Hearing allegations of cruelty to animals in research settings, many are perplexed that anyone would deliberately harm an animal.
段3:①Scientists must communicate their message to the public in a compassionate, understandable way—in human terms, not in the language of molecular biology. ②We need to make clear the connection between animal research and a grandmother’s hip replacement, a father’s bypass operation, a baby’s vaccinations, and even a pet’s shots. ③To those who are unaware that animal research was needed to produce these treatments, as well as new treatments and vaccines, animal research seems wasteful at best and cruel at worst.
段4:①Much can be done. ②Scientists could “adopt” middle school classes and present their own research. ③They should be quick to respond to letters to the editor, lest animal rights misinformation go unchallenged and acquire a deceptive appearance of truth. ④Research institutions could be opened to tours, to show that laboratory animals receive humane care. ⑤Finally, because the ultimate stakeholders are patients, the health research community should actively recruit to its cause not only well-known personalities such as Stephen Cooper, who has made courageous statements about the value of animal research, but all who receive medical treatment. ⑥If good people do nothing, there is a real possibility that an uninformed citizenry will extinguish the precious embers of medical progress.
49. The author believes that, in face of the challenge from animal rights advocates, scientists should
[A] communicate more with the public.
[B] employ hi-tech means in research.
[C] feel no shame for their cause.
[D] strive to develop new cures.
答案:A
问:49题D选项strive to develop new cures的错误原因是下列哪项?
A : 选项内容并非The author提出的建议,而是Research institutions(研究机构)给出的建议,选项答非所问
B : 该选项中的内容在原文没有提及,属于无中生有
C : 题干+选项意为“作者建议科学家努力开发新的治疗方法”,而原文虽然提及new treatments,但表达的是“获得新的治疗方法需要动物研究”,选项属于曲解原文
查看答案和解析【26考研辅导课程推荐】:26考研集训课程,VIP领学计划,26考研VIP全科定制套餐(公共课VIP+专业课1对1) , 这些课程中都会配有内部讲义以及辅导书和资料,同时会有教研教辅双师模式对大家进行教学以及督学,并配有24小时答疑和模拟测试等,可直接咨询在线客服老师领取大额优惠券。
启航教育热门私房课
MORE