选课程 
- 选课程
- 查院校
- 查专业
- 找资讯
400-108-7500
段2：①But as recently as in 1968, jury selection procedures conflicted with these democratic ideals. ②In some states, for example, jury duty was limited to persons of supposedly superior intelligence, education, and moral character. ③Although the Supreme Court of the United States had prohibited intentional racial discrimination in jury selection as early as the 1880 case of Strauderv. West Virginia, the practice of selecting so-called elite or blue-ribbon juries provided a convenient way around this and other antidiscrimination laws.
37.The practice of selecting so-called elite jurors prior to 1968 showed .
[A] the inadequacy of anti-discrimination laws
[B] the prevalent discrimination against certain races
[C] the conflicting ideals in jury selection procedures
[D] the arrogance common among the Supreme Court judges
答案：A
问：37题C选项的错误原因是下列哪项？
A : 原文说的相冲突的两者是jury selection procedures（陪审团遴选程序）和these democratic ideals（这些民主理想），而非选项所说的“陪审团遴选程序之中的理念相互冲突”
B : 原文提到，陪审团职务仅限于被认为superior intelligence, education, and moral character（智力、学历和道德品质都高人一等）的人群，说明陪审团遴选程序内部理念是比较一致的，并不存在冲突
C : 原文虽然提到了conflicted（冲突），但说的是不同陪审员之间的冲突，而非陪审团遴选程序的理念相互冲突
查看答案和解析【26考研辅导课程推荐】：26考研集训课程,VIP领学计划,26考研VIP全科定制套餐（公共课VIP＋专业课1对1） , 这些课程中都会配有内部讲义以及辅导书和资料，同时会有教研教辅双师模式对大家进行教学以及督学，并配有24小时答疑和模拟测试等，可直接咨询在线客服老师领取大额优惠券。
启航教育热门私房课
MORE
