【段7】①But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. ②New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel application s of the Constitution’s protections. ③Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.
30.Orin Kerr’s comparison is quoted to indicate that
[A] the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.
[B] new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution.
[C] California’s argument violates principles of the Constitution.
[D] principles of the Constitution should never be altered.
答案：B
问：引用奥林·克尔的对比是为了支撑原文中哪句话的观点？
A : 段7句②
B : 段7句③
C : 段7句①
查看答案和解析【26考研辅导课程推荐】：26考研集训课程,VIP领学计划,26考研VIP全科定制套餐（公共课VIP＋专业课1对1） , 这些课程中都会配有内部讲义以及辅导书和资料，同时会有教研教辅双师模式对大家进行教学以及督学，并配有24小时答疑和模拟测试等，可直接咨询在线客服老师领取大额优惠券。
启航教育热门私房课
MORE
